New PIJM now accepts submissions exclusively via the Editorial Scholar portal — a dedicated submission & review system.
Go to Editorial Scholar →
Associated Management Consultants Pvt. Ltd. | COPE Member
Scopus Q2 UGC-CARE |
Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management logo

Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management

ISSN: 0975-2854 Frequency: Monthly Peer Review: Double-blind Published since: 2008 Language: English
A publication of AMCPL
amcon.co.in
New Delhi, India
Indexed in: Scopus Q2 UGC-CARE Group II Google Scholar J-Gate NISCAIR Crossref Cabell's Journalytics

Effect of Parasocial Commitment and Breakup with a Fictional Character on Purchase Intention

Open Access Original Article

Effect of Parasocial Commitment and Breakup with a Fictional Character on Purchase Intention

Abhay Grover1,  Nilesh Arora2

1 Assistant Professor , Lovely Professional University, Punjab, Jalandhar - Delhi, Grand Trunk Rd, Phagwara – 144 411, Punjab

2 Post-Doctoral Research Scholar, Putra Business School, University Putra Malaysia & Professor & Director, University School of Business, Chandigarh University, Punjab, NH05, Chandigarh - Ludhiana Highway, Gharuan, Mohali - 140 413, Punjab

Volume 17
Issue 9
Pages 8–23
Year 2024
Received: Sept. 20, 2023 Accepted: July 5, 2024 Published: Sept. 14, 2024
Abstract

Purpose : To mitigate the danger of non-fictional character transgression, this study used the investment model and research on fictional character endorsement. Furthermore, it attempted to investigate how parasocial breakup (PSB) mediated the relationship between commitment to parasocial relationships (PSR) and purchase intention (PI) for the fictional character.

Design/Methodology/Approach : A mixed-methods approach was employed in the subject selection process. The states and districts were chosen using a random sampling process based on a lottery system. Additionally, the quota for each chosen state and district was fixed using a quota sampling technique. The current study selected five states from 29 states, as well as five districts within each state, using the lottery method of random sampling technique. Furthermore, the quota for each chosen state was determined using the quota sampling approach.

Findings : The present study’s findings showed a positive relationship between commitment to PSR with a fictional character and PI. However, PSB appeared to negatively mediate the relationship between commitment to PSR and PI concerning the fictional character.

Practical Implications : Fictional characters could serve as a potent marketing tool capable of effectively promoting consumer parasocial commitment and PI. Therefore, companies should contemplate incorporating fictional characters in their marketing strategies, particularly in product categories where consumers exhibit low involvement and require a relationship-building experience with the brand.

Originality/Value : As far as we know, this is the first study to analyze the interplay between commitment in a PSR, PSR break-up, and PI.

Keywords fictional character parasocial relationship (PSR) parasocial breakup (PSB) purchase intention (PI) endorsement investment model
How to Cite

Abhay Grover, Nilesh Arora (2024). Effect of Parasocial Commitment and Breakup with a Fictional Character on Purchase Intention. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 17(9), 8–23. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2024/v17i9/173939

References
  1. Al-Adwan, A. S., & Kokash, H. (2019). The driving forces of Facebook social commerce. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 14(2), 15–32. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-18762019000200103
  2. Aldridge, V., Dovey, T. M., & Halford, J. C. (2009). The role of familiarity in dietary development. Developmental Review, 29(1), 32–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2008.11.001
  3. Anwer, J. (2015, November 25). Snapdeal is under fire because Aamir Khan said something. India Today. https://www.indiatoday.in/technology/news/story/snapdeal-is-under-fire-because-aamir-khan-said-something-274220-2015-11-24
  4. Bakshi, M., & Verma, R. (2023). Cause-related marketing and purchase intention : A study on Indian millennials. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 16(10), 32–45. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2023/v16i10/173196
  5. Ballantine, P. W., & Martin, B. A. (2005). Forming parasocial relationships in online communities. In G. Menon & A. R. Rao (eds.), NA – Advances in consumer research (Vol. 32, pp. 197–201). Association for Consumer Research.
  6. Baraldi, S., Kalyal, H. J., Berntson, E., Näswall, K., & Sverke, M. (2010). The importance of commitment to change in public reform : An example from Pakistan. Journal of Change Management, 10(4), 347–368. https://doi.org/10.1080/14697017.2010.516482
  7. Belch, G. E., Belch, M. A., & Purani, K. (2013). Advertising and promotion : An integrated marketing communication perspective (9th ed.). McGraw Hill Education.
  8. Bharucha, J. (2018). Cutting through the clutter: Mascots in Indian marketing. International Journal of Economics and Business Research, 16(4), 534–545. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEBR.2018.095351
  9. Born, D. (2021, May 25). The power of fictional characters in advertising. MUSE by Clio. https://musebycl.io/musings/power-fictional-characters-advertising
  10. Branch, S. E., Wilson, K. M., & Agnew, C. R. (2013). Committed to Oprah, Homer, or House: Using the investment model to understand parasocial relationships. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 2(2), 96–109. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030938
  11. Bringe, A. (2022, October 18). The rise of virtual influencers and what it means for brands. Forbes Communications Council. https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbescommunicationscouncil/2022/10/18/the-rise-of-virtual-influencers-and-what-it-means-for-brands/?sh=5017248c6b56
  12. Brockner, J., & Swap, W. C. (1976). Effects of repeated exposure and attitudinal similarity on self-disclosure and interpersonal attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 33(5), 531–540. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.33.5.531
  13. Brunick, K. L., Putnam, M. M., McGarry, L. E., Richards, M. N., & Calvert, S. L. (2016). Children's future parasocial relationships with media characters: The age of intelligent characters. Journal of Children and Media, 10(2), 181–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2015.1127839
  14. Chandel, S., Chanda, K., & Chandel, K. (2023). Factors influencing organizational commitment, job involvement, and work-life balance among employees of banks: An analysis. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 16(7), 43–58. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2023/v16i7/172927
  15. Chung, S., & Cho, H. (2017). Fostering parasocial relationships with celebrities on social media: Implications for celebrity endorsement. Psychology & Marketing, 34(4), 481–495. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21001
  16. Cohen, J. (1997). Parasocial relations and romantic attraction: Gender and dating status differences. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 41(4), 516–529. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838159709364424
  17. Cohen, J. (2003). Parasocial breakups: Measuring individual differences in responses to the dissolution of parasocial relationships. Mass Communication and Society, 6(2), 191–202. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327825mcs0602_5
  18. Dentsu Aegis Network. (2020). Digital advertising in India (2020 edition). https://www.dentsu.com/
  19. Deshpande, R., & Chakraborty, D. (2023a). Impact of work stressors on career commitment – A study of Indian IT sector employees. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 16(11), 27–42. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2023/v16i11/173214
  20. Deshpande, R., & Chakraborty, D. (2023b). Studying career commitment of Indian technology professionals with the moderating effect of perceived external employability. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 16(9), 8–25. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2023/v16i9/173164
  21. Eyal, K., & Cohen, J. (2006). When good friends say goodbye: A parasocial breakup study. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 50(3), 502–523. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15506878jobem5003_9
  22. Eyal, K., & Dailey, R. M. (2012). Examining relational maintenance in parasocial relationships. Mass Communication and Society, 15(5), 758–781. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2011.616276
  23. Gaskin, J. E. (2016). Stats tools package - Validity and reliability (Stats tools package). http://statwiki.gaskination.com/
  24. Gong, W., & Li, X. (2019). Microblogging reactions to celebrity endorsement: Effects of parasocial relationship and source factors. Chinese Journal of Communication, 12(2), 187–205. https://doi.org/10.1080/17544750.2018.1511607
  25. Hair Jr., J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2014). Multivariate data analysis: Pearson new international edition (7th ed.). Pearson Education Limited.
  26. Hakimian, F., Farid, H., Ismail, M. N., & Nair, P. K. (2016). Importance of commitment in encouraging employees' innovative behaviour. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration, 8(1), 70–83. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJBA-06-2015-0054
  27. Hall, A. E. (2019). Identification and parasocial relationships with characters from Star Wars: The Force Awakens. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 8(1), 88–98. https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000160
  28. Holladay, H. W., & Edgar, A. N. (2019). 'I'm never gonna stop watching it': The paradox of parasocial break-ups in a post-object era. Journal of Fandom Studies, 7(3), 213–227. https://doi.org/10.1386/jfs_00001_1
  29. Horton, D., & Wohl, R. R. (1956). Mass communication and para-social interaction: Observations on intimacy at a distance. Psychiatry, 19(3), 215–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/00332747.1956.11023049
  30. Hu, M. (2016). The influence of a scandal on parasocial relationship, parasocial interaction, and parasocial breakup. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 5(3), 217–231. https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000068
  31. Jain, R. (2023). Country-of-origin effect on domestic product evaluation and purchase intention relationship in India. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 16(1), 56–69. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2023/v16i1/172669
  32. Johnson, J. (2021). Global digital population as of January 2021. Statista. https://www.statista.com/statistics/617136/digital-population-worldwide/
  33. Jones, S., Cronin, J., & Piacentini, M. G. (2022). Celebrity brand break-up: Fan experiences of para-loveshock. Journal of Business Research, 145, 720–731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.03.039
  34. Kewalramani, N., & Sandeep, H. M. (2012). Character merchandising. Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 17(5), 454–462.
  35. Khatri, P. (2006). Celebrity endorsement : A strategic promotion perspective. Indian Media Studies Journal, 1(1), 25–37.
  36. Kim, H., Ko, E., & Kim, J. (2015). SNS users' para-social relationships with celebrities: Social media effects on purchase intentions. Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science, 25(3), 279–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/21639159.2015.1043690
  37. Knittel, C. R., & Stango, V. (2014). Celebrity endorsements, firm value, and reputation risk: Evidence from the Tiger Woods scandal. Management Science, 60(1), 21–37. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2013.1749
  38. Knoll, J., Schramm, H., Schallhorn, C., & Wynistorf, S. (2015). Good guy vs. bad guy: The influence of parasocial interactions with media characters on brand placement effects. International Journal of Advertising, 34(5), 720–743. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2015.1009350
  39. Lacap, J. P., Cruz, M. R., Bayson, A. J., Molano, R., & Garcia, J. G. (2024). Parasocial relationships and social media interactions: Building brand credibility and loyalty. Spanish Journal of Marketing - ESIC, 28(1), 77–97. https://doi.org/10.1108/SJME-09-2022-0190
  40. Leibner, J., Mader, G., & Weiss, A. (2009). The power of strategic commitment: Achieving extraordinary results through total alignment and engagement. AMACOM Div American Management Association.
  41. Leite, F. P., & Baptista, P. (2021). The effects of social media influencers' self-disclosure on behavioral intentions: The role of source credibility, parasocial relationships, and brand trust. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 30(3), 295–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/10696679.2021.1935275
  42. Liebers, N., & Schramm, H. (2019). Parasocial interactions and relationships with media characters–An inventory of 60 years of research. Communication Research Trends, 38(2), 4–31.
  43. Lim, C. M., & Kim, Y.-K. (2011). Older consumers' TV home shopping: Loneliness, parasocial interaction, and perceived convenience. Psychology & Marketing, 28(8), 763–780. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20411
  44. Liu, X., Liu, Z.-Z., Yang, Y., & Jia, C.-X. (2024). Starting a romantic relationship, breakups, and sleep: A longitudinal study of Chinese adolescents. Behavioral Sleep Medicine, 22(2), 190–205. https://doi.org/10.1080/15402002.2023.2217973
  45. Lopez, A. (2021). Can we get back together? Measuring brand relationship breakup. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 20(3), 681– 694. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.1895
  46. Lou, C., & Kim, H. K. (2019). Fancying the new rich and famous? Explicating the roles of influencer content, credibility, and parental mediation in adolescents' parasocial relationship, materialism, and purchase intentions. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02567
  47. Mathur, S., Vishnoi, S. K., Bagga, T., Mittal, A., & Mittal, A. (2024). Examining the impact of argument quality and source credibility on consumers' behavioral intention toward green cosmetics: The moderating role of perceived innovativeness. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 17(3), 26–47. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2024/v17i3/173364
  48. Ministry of Jal Shakti. (2020, November 4). Ganga rejuvenation is a continuous task which needs public participation: Union Jal Shakti Minister at Ganga Utsav 2020 [Press Release]. https://www.pib.gov.in/PressReleasePage.aspx?PRID=1670163
  49. Mishra, R., Sharma, M. P., Seth, K., & Singh, V. (2023). A study on consumers' travel purchase intention through travel apps. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 16(7), 25–42. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2023/v16i7/172926
  50. Park, J., Lennon, S. J., & Stoel, L. (2005). On-line product presentation: Effects on mood, perceived risk, and purchase intention. Psychology & Marketing, 22(9), 695–719. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20080
  51. Ravichandran, S. S. (2023). Circular economy elements in marketing communications: An opinion perspective for a sustainable future. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 16(8), 65–71. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2023/v16i8/173065
  52. Rhatigan, D. L., & Axsom, D. K. (2006). Using the investment model to understand battered women's commitment to abusive relationships. Journal of Family Violence, 21(2), 153–162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-005-9013-z
  53. Roshan, A., & Mehta, P. (2022). Four-day workweek as post-COVID-19 alternate work arrangement: The mediating role of organizational commitment. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 15(1), 8–24. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2022/v15i1/167859
  54. Rusbult, C. E. (1980). Commitment and satisfaction in romantic associations: A test of the investment model. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 16(2), 172–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(80)90007-4
  55. Rusbult, C. E. (1983). A longitudinal test of the investment model: The development (and deterioration) of satisfaction and commitment in heterosexual involvements. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(1), 101–117. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.45.1.101
  56. Rusbult, C. E., Agnew, C. R., & Arriaga, X. B. (2012). The investment model of commitment processes. In P. A. Van Lange, A. W. Kruglanski & E. T. Higgins (eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 218–231). Sage Publications Limited. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446249222.n37
  57. Rusbult, C. E., Martz, J. M., & Agnew, C. R. (1998). The investment model scale: Measuring commitment level, satisfaction level, quality of alternatives, and investment size. Personal Relationships, 5(4), 357–387. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.1998.tb00177.x
  58. Salinas, S. (2018, September 7). Tesla stock closes down 6% after top executives resign and Elon Musk smokes weed on video. CNBC. https://www.cnbc.com/2018/09/07/tesla-sinks-8percent-after-bizarre-musk-podcast-appearance-cao-exit.html
  59. Skumanich, S. A., & Kintsfather, D. P. (1998). Individual media dependency relations within television shopping programming: A casual model reviewed and revised. Communication Research, 25(2), 200–219. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365098025002004
  60. Stever, G. S. (2017). Evolutionary theory and reactions to mass media: Understanding parasocial attachment. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 6(2), 95–102. https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000116
  61. Van der Waldt, D. L., Van Loggerenberg, M., & Wehmeyer, L. (2009). Celebrity endorsements versus created spokespersons in advertising: A survey among students. South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences, 12(1), 100–114. https://hdl.handle.net/10520/EJC31269
  62. Wang, J.-S., Cheng, Y.-F., & Chu, Y.-L. (2013). Effect of celebrity endorsements on consumer purchase intentions: Advertising effect and advertising appeal as mediators. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, 23(5), 357–367. https://doi.org/10.1002/hfm.20336
  63. Zajonc, R. B. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9(2, Pt.2), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0025848
  64. Zwetsloot, G. I., Kines, P., Ruotsala, R., Drupsteen, L., Merivirta, M.-L., & Bezemer, R. A. (2017). The importance of commitment, communication, culture and learning for the implementation of the zero accident vision in 27 companies in Europe. Safety Science, 96, 22–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2017.03.001
Editorial Scholar

Submit your Research to PIJM

Submit your Manuscript → Author Guidelines