Purpose : The purpose of this research was to investigate the perception of Indian youth regarding the start-up environment in India. The study aimed to identify the factors influencing the youth’s perception and determine their attitudes toward entrepreneurship in the Indian scenario.

Methodology : The study analyzed the relationship between the constructs using a descriptive research technique. This study’s data was acquired using a standardized questionnaire and verified metrics. The data were acquired mostly from the Bhopal city by using a Google form (Madhya Pradesh). The inverse square root method was used to compute the sample size required for the study. Using SmartPLS software, the structural model of the study was examined, and the hypotheses were tested.

Findings : According to the study’s findings, government initiatives are the most influential factor in creating an environment for start-ups. The start-up ecosystem has the most direct impact on promoting start-ups.

Practical Implications : The government’s policies and initiatives play a crucial role in promoting entrepreneurship and creating an environment that supports start-up growth. Government support programs can help young entrepreneurs access funding, mentorship, and other resources necessary to start and grow a successful business.

Originality : Previous research on start-ups has often focused on factors such as access to capital, market conditions, and regulatory environments. However, understanding the perceptions of Indian youth towards the government’s role in creating a start-up ecosystem can provide a unique perspective on how the government can effectively support start-ups in India.

1. Bajaj, K., & Mehendale, S. (2016). Food-delivery start-ups: In search of the core. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 9(10), 42–53. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2016/v9i10/103073
2. Chaudhury, S. K., Panigrahi, A., & Gaur, M. (2019). An empirical study of sources of early stage start-up funding for innovative startup firms: A study of five states of India. Indian Journal of Finance, 13(9), 48–57. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijf/2019/v13i9/147099
3. Credit Suisse. (2021). India’s 100-strong unicorn club drives radical change in the country’s corporate landscape. https://www.credit-suisse.com/about-us-news/en/articles/news-and-expertise/indias-100-strong-unicorn-club-drives-radical-change-202102.html
4. Fornell, C. G., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement errors. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312
5. Global Entrepreneurship Monitor. (2021). Women’s entrepreneurship report 2021. https://www.gemconsortium.org/reports/womens-entrepreneurship
6. Gold, A. H., Malhotra, A., & Segars, A. H. (2001). Knowledge management: An organizational capabilities perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(1), 185–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2001.11045669
7. Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis. Prentice-Hall.
8. Hu, L.-T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
9. Kline, R. (2005). Methodology in the social sciences: Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). Guilford Press.
10. Litania, A., & Shukla, S. (2018). Incubators as catalysts for innovation. International Journal of Innovation and Economic Development, 4(2), 34–47.
11. Munshi, A., & Singla, A. R. (2022). Exploring key growth drivers and strategies for enhancing performance of Indian food tech startups. Indian Journal of Marketing, 52(1), 42–57. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2022/v52/i1/159847
12. Pandey, N. K. (2018). An analysis of startup ecosystem in metropolitan city in India. International Journal of Engineering and Management Research (IJEMR), 8(2), 237–244. http://dx.doi.org/10.31033/ijemr.v8i02.12029
13. Rani, A. (2017). Startup India: Opportunities & challenges “Start up India stand up India.” ACADEMICIA: An International Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 7(1), 104–113. http://dx.doi.org/10.5958/2249-7137.2017.00008.8
14. Reserve Bank of India. (2019, June 25). Publication report. https://www.rbi.org.in/Scripts/PublicationReportDetails.aspx?UrlPage=&ID=924
15. Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Becker, J.-M. (2015). SmartPLS 3. SmartPLS GmbH. http://www.smartpls.com
16. Sharma, K., & Mathur, H. P. (2022). Contextualizing sustainability with reference to startups. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 15(7), 8–23. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2022/v15i7/170788
17. Sharma, S., & Goyal, D. P. (2020). Entrepreneurial marketing strategies for small businesses: An exploratory study of start-up companies in India. Indian Journal of Marketing, 50(8–9), 48–65. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2020/v50/i8-9/154691
18. Singh, S., Chauhan, A., & Dhir, S. (2020). Analyzing the startup ecosystem of India: A Twitter analytics perspective. Journal of Advances in Management Research, 17(2), 262–281. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAMR-08-2019-0164
19. Sitaraman, S., Borde, N., & Desai, P. H. (2022). Analyzing the gender gap in patents: A lesson from startups. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 15(9), 8–24. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2022/v15i9/172192
20. Statistics Times. (2021, June 8). GDP of India. https://statisticstimes.com/economy/country/india-gdp.php
21. Venkat, R., Gupta, A., Banerjee, J., & Chellappan, R. B. (2021). Value addition for technology start-ups through physical co-location. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 14(11), 8–24. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2021/v14i11/166978
22. Yoo, Y., & Alavi, M. (2001). Media and group cohesion: Reflective influences on social presence, task participation, and group consensus. MIS Quarterly, 25(3), 371–390. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250922