New PIJM now accepts submissions exclusively via the Editorial Scholar portal — a dedicated submission & review system.
Go to Editorial Scholar →
Associated Management Consultants Pvt. Ltd. | COPE Member
Scopus Q2 UGC-CARE |
Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management logo

Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management

ISSN: 0975-2854 Frequency: Monthly Peer Review: Double-blind Published since: 2008 Language: English
A publication of AMCPL
amcon.co.in
New Delhi, India
Indexed in: Scopus Q2 UGC-CARE Group II Google Scholar J-Gate NISCAIR Crossref Cabell's Journalytics

Importance of Perception as a Parameter in University Rankings : A Critical Evaluation

Open Access Original Article

Importance of Perception as a Parameter in University Rankings : A Critical Evaluation

Shashi Singh1,  Ajay Singh2

1 Associate Professor, Department of Education, Central University of Jharkhand, Ranchi - 835 205, Jharkhand

2 Professor & Director, BBS College of Engineering & Technology, Prayagraj - 211 003, Uttar Pradesh

Volume 14
Issue 11
Pages 25–40
Year 2021
Received: April 20, 2021 Accepted: Oct. 15, 2021 Published: Nov. 15, 2021
Abstract

Assigning ranks and grades (or stars) has been a common practice for ages to describe the characteristics of a product with the intention that it will significantly influence customers’ buying behavior. What started as a marketing tool to compare and show supremacy over competitors’ products, ranking and grading have now become institutionalized, involving many commercials at stake. Nowadays, ranking evaluation has altogether become separate diligence with stiff competition among different players. Such types of rankings and accreditations have also influenced the education sector. Though there are various international rankings (QS World University Rankings, Shanghai Ranking, Academic Ranking of World Universities, etc.) for the education sector, the Indian government also administrates its ranking system to bring in a sense of competition and performance reviews among academic institutions of India. With this thought, the National Institution Ranking Framework (NIRF), also popularly known as ‘India Rankings,’ was started in 2015. The NIRF rankings of higher education institutions (HEIs) offering engineering education were considered for the study. Perception as an evaluation indicator has always been debated for its validity in the finalization of such rankings. This paper attempted to scientifically study the influence that the parameter ‘perception’ contributes to the overall ranking of HEIs.

Keywords India Rankings NIRF HEIs Higher Education System Higher Education Ranking
How to Cite

Shashi Singh, Ajay Singh (2021). Importance of Perception as a Parameter in University Rankings : A Critical Evaluation. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 14(11), 25–40. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2021/v14i11/166979

References
  1. Altbach, P. (2011). Ranking season is here. International Higher Education, 62. https://doi.org/10.6017/ihe.2011.62.8531
  2. Bagga, T. (2017). Accreditation compulsion or inducement: A perception study of various stakeholders. Prabandhan : Indian Journal of Management, 10(12), 7–19. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2017/v10i12/119977
  3. Burlakanti, K., Kumar, J. N., & Srinivas, R. V. (2014). Parents’ perception about factors of quality education in private schools in Kakinada city, Andhra Pradesh. Prabandhan : Indian Journal of Management, 7(4), 5–16. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2014/v7i4/59304
  4. Chugh, K. L., Alekhya, N., & Kishore, N. P. (2017). Quality research publications - A key differentiator in India Rankings 2017. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology, 8(6), 117–124. http://www.iaeme.com/MasterAdmin/Journal_uploads/IJMET/VOLUME_8_ISSUE_6/IJMET_08_06_012.pdf
  5. Clarke, M. (2002).Some guidelines for academic quality rankings. Higher Education in Europe, 27(4), 443–459. https://doi.org/10.1080/0379772022000071922
  6. Davis, M. (2016). Can college ranking be believed? She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, 2(3), 215–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sheji.2016.11.002
  7. Gupta, B. M. (2010). Ranking and performance of Indian universities, based on publication and citation data. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 3(7), 837–843. https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2010/v3i7.21
  8. Hazelkorn, E. (2015). Rankings and the reshaping of higher education: The battle for world-class excellence (2nd ed.). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137446671
  9. IHEP. (2007). College and university ranking systems. http://www.ihep.org/sites/default/files/uploads/docs/pubs/collegerankingsystems.pdf
  10. Khatri, P., & Raina, K. (2019). Education, state, and psychology : A study of students’ pre- and post-perceptions of training intervention. Prabandhan : Indian Journal of Management, 12(12), 38–48. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2019/v12i12/149271
  11. National Institutional Ranking Framework. (2018). India Rankings 2018. Department of Higher Education, Ministry of Education, Government of India. https://www.nirfindia.org/2018/pdf/nirf_2018_final.pdf
  12. National Institutional Ranking Framework. (2020). India Rankings 2020. Department of Higher Education, Ministry of Education, Government of India. https://www.nirfindia.org/nirfpdfcdn/2020/pdf/Report/IR2020_Report.pdf
  13. Padalkar, M., & Gopinath, S. (2015). Do Indian management practices drive global research agenda ? An exploratory analysis of contemporary management literature. Journal of Indian Business Research, 7(2), 108 –139. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIBR-01-2015-0009
  14. Prathap, G. (2014). The performance of research-intensive higher educational institutions in India. Current Science, 107(3), 389–396. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24103492
  15. Ramanathan, V. (2018). Internalization of higher education in India : Existing realities and future outlook. Prabandhan : Indian Journal of Management, 11(6), 40–52. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2018/v11i6/128441
  16. Reddy, K., Xie, E., & Tang, Q. (2016). Higher education, high-impact research, and world university rankings : A case of India and comparison with China. Pacific Science Review B: Humanities and Social Sciences, 2(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psrb.2016.09.004
  17. Sahoo, B. K., Singh, R., Mishra, B., & Sankaran, K. (2017). Research productivity in management schools of India during 1968-2015: A directional benefit-of-doubt model analysis. Omega, 66 (Part A: January), 118–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2016.02.004
  18. Saisana, M., d’Hombres, B., & Saltelli, A. (2011). Rickety numbers: Volatility of university rankings and policy implications. Research Policy, 40(1), 165–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.09.003
  19. Saji, T. G. (2020). Undergraduate education in India: Dissecting the perception gaps in students’ expectations. Prabandhan : Indian Journal of Management, 13(8 –9), 28–41. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2020/v13i8-9/155231
  20. Sidorenko, T., & Gorbatova, T. (2015). Efficiency of Russian education through the scale of World University Rankings. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 166, 464–467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.12.555
  21. Valcárcel, M. (2017). Usefulness of analytical research: Rethinking analytical R&D&T strategies. Analytical Chemistry, 89(21), 11167–11172. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.7b03935
  22. Van Raan, A. F. (2005). Fatal attraction: Conceptual and methodological problems in the ranking of universities by bibliometric methods. Scientometrics, 62, 133 –143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-005-0008-6
  23. Vernon, M. M., Balas, E. A., & Momani, S. (2018). Are university rankings useful to improve research? A systematic review. PLoS ONE, 13(3), e0193762. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193762
  24. Yeravdekar, V. R., & Tiwari, G. (2014). Global rankings of higher education institutions and India’s effective non-presence: Why have world-class universities eluded the Indian higher education system? And, how worthwhile is the Indian government’s captivation to launch world-class universities? Procedia –Social and Behavioral Sciences, 157, 63–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.11.010
Editorial Scholar

Submit your Research to PIJM

Submit your Manuscript → Author Guidelines