Numerous economic theories, knowledge, social, and communication theories have extensively explored the phenomenon of ‘physical co-location’ in various contexts. However, limited scholarly attention has been given to co-location in emerging contexts such as co-working spaces, predominantly used by start-ups. One of the critical questions examined is how co-location adds value to technology start-ups in the early and growth stages of their development. We chose a premium coworking space in Bangalore, India’s start-up capital, as the study’s research setting during January – March 2020. The qualitative research employed semi-structured interviews to explore the phenomenon. Our findings revealed that start-ups actively used co-located resources to explore, experiment, and validate new business ideas in the early stage. As they transitioned into the growth phase, they exploited co-located industry networks to expand into new markets. They also learned vicariously from other co-located resources and used them to solve complex problems and refined their processes and routines. As start-ups begin to grow and expand, co-location infrastructure-related costs are not justifiable, operations are less secure, and the meta culture of the co-located environment is in conflict with the firm’s operating culture. The results of this study have the potential to be significant for technology start-ups that are exploring new ways of working and addressing uncertainties during the early and growth stages of their development.

1. Aggarwal, V. (2019). A conceptual study on factors of entrepreneurial potentiality and their impact on entrepreneurial intention with the moderating role of entrepreneurship education. Prabandhan : Indian Journal of Management, 12(6), 7–19. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2019/v12i6/144932
2. Alcácer, J., & Delgado, M. (2016). Spatial organization of firms and location choices through the value chain. Management Science, 62(11), 3213–3234. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2015.2308
3. Bagla, R. K., & Khan, J. (2017). Customers’ expectations and satisfaction with online food ordering portals. Prabandhan : Indian Journal of Management, 10(11), 31–44. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2017/v10i11/119401
4. Bajaj, K., & Mehendale, S. (2016). Food - delivery start-ups: In search of the core. Prabandhan : Indian Journal of Management, 9(10), 42–53. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2016/v9i10/103073
5. Baker, M., Robinson, J. S., & Kolb, D. (2012). Aligning Kolb’s experiential learning theory with a comprehensive agricultural education model. Journal of Agricultural Education, 53(4), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2012.04001
6. Barwinski, R. W., Qiu, Y., Aslam, M. M., & Clauss, T. (2020). Changing with the time: New ventures’ quest for innovation. Journal of Small Business Strategy, 30(1), 18–30. https://libjournals.mtsu.edu/index.php/jsbs/article/view/1662
7. Beaudry, C., & Swann, G. M. (2009). Firm growth in industrial clusters of the United Kingdom. Small Business Economics, 32, 409–424. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-007-9083-9
8. Becerra, M., Lunnan, R., & Huemer, L. (2008). Trustworthiness, risk, and the transfer of tacit and explicit knowledge between alliance partners. Journal of Management Studies, 45(4), 691–713. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00766.x
9. Belderbos, R., Olffen, W. V., & Zou, J. (2011). Generic and specific social learning mechanisms in foreign entry location choice. Strategic Management Journal, 32(12), 1309–1330. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.938
10. Bilandzic, M., Schroeter, R., & Foth, M. (2013). Gelatine: Making coworking places gel for better collaboration and social learning. OzCHI’13: Proceedings of the 25th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference: Augmentation, Application, Innovation, Collaboration (pp. 427–436). https://doi.org/10.1145/2541016.2541027
11. Bouncken, R. B., & Fredrich, V. (2016). Joint knowledge creation and protection in coopetitive business model innovation. Academy of Management Proceedings, Vol. 2016(1), 1688–1693. https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2016.48
12. Bouncken, R. B., Laudien, S. M., Fredrich, V., & Görmar, L. (2018). Coopetition in coworking-spaces: Value creation and appropriation tensions in an entrepreneurial space. Review of Managerial Science, 12, 385–410. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-017-0267-7
13. Bouncken, R., Ratzmann, M., Barwinski, R., & Kraus, S. (2020). Coworking spaces: Empowerment for entrepreneurship and innovation in the digital and sharing economy. Journal of Business Research, 114, 102–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.03.033
14. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589–597. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806
15. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 328–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238
16. Burt, R. S. (2000). The network structure of social capital. Research in Organizational Behavior, 22, 345–423. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0191-3085(00)22009-1
17. Capdevila, I. (2014). Different inter-organizational collaboration approaches in coworking spaces in Barcelona. SSRN Electronic Journal, 1–30. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2502816
18. Chakraborty, D., & Altekar, S. (2021). Work from home (WFH), COVID-19, and its impact on women. Prabandhan : Indian Journal of Management, 14(9), 22–29. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2021/v14i9/166294
19. Cho, Y.- K. (2018). Knowledge-based approach and total factor productivity: Focusing on Korean manufacturing industry. Korea Association for International Commerce and Information, 20(3), 235–259. https://doi.org/10.15798/kaici.2018.20.3.235
20. Collins, H. (2010). Tacit and explicit knowledge. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226113821.001.0001
21. Csaszar, F. A., & Levinthal, D. A. (2016). Mental representation and the discovery of new strategies. Strategic Management Journal, 37(10), 2031–2049. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2440
22. Deeds, D. L., Decarolis, D., & Coombs, J. (2000). Dynamic capabilities and new product development in high technology ventures: An empirical analysis of new biotechnology firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 15(3), 211–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(98)00013-5
23. Delgado, M. (2020). The co-location of innovation and production in clusters. Industry and Innovation, 27(8), 842–870. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2019.1709419
24. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1995). Transforming qualitative research methods: Is it a revolution? Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 24(3), 349–358. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124195024003006
25. Dorry, S. (2014). Innovating in urban economies: Economic transformation in Canadian city-regions. Space and Polity, 20(2), 246–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562576.2016.1189036
26. Dubé, J., Brunelle, C., & Legros, D. (2016). Location theories and business location decision: A micro-spatial investigation of a nonmetropolitan area in Canada. Review of Regional Studies, 46(2), 143–170. https://doi.org/10.52324/001c.8039
27. Dworkin, S. L. (2012). Sample size policy for qualitative studies using in-depth interviews. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41(6), 1319–1320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-012-0016-6
28. Edgeworth, F. Y. (1895). [Review of Principles of Economics., by A. Marshall]. The Economic Journal, 5(20), 585–589. https://doi.org/10.2307/2956644
29. Folta, T. B., Cooper, A. C., & Baik, Y. - S. (2006). Geographic cluster size and firm performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 21(2), 217–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2005.04.005
30. Frese, M. (2009). Towards a psychology of entrepreneurship - An action theory perspective. Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship, 5(6), 437–496. https://doi.org/10.1561/0300000028
31. Ghaljaie, F., Naderifar, M., & Goli, H. (2017). Snowball sampling: A purposeful method of sampling in qualitative research. Strides in Development of Medical Education, 14(3). https://doi.org/10.5812/sdme.67670
32. Graebner, M. E. (2004). Momentum and serendipity: How acquired leaders create value in the integration of technology firms. Strategic Management Journal, 25(8–9), 751–777. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.419
33. Hite, J. M., & Hesterly, W. S. (2001). The evolution of firm networks: From emergence to early growth of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 22(3), 275–286. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.156
34. Kalnins, A., & Chung, W. (2004). Resource-seeking agglomeration: A study of market entry in the lodging industry. Strategic Management Journal, 25(7), 689–699. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.403
35. Kor, Y. Y., & Misangyi, V. F. (2008). Outside directors’ industry-specific experience and firms’ liability of newness. Strategic Management Journal, 29(12), 1345–1355. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.709
36. Levinthal, D. A., & March, J. G. (1993). The myopia of learning. Strategic Management Journal, 14(S2), 95–112. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250141009
37. Levitt, B., & March, J. G. (1988). Organizational learning. Annual Review of Sociology, 14, 319–338. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.14.080188.001535
38. Lichtenstein, B. B., Dooley, K. J., & Lumpkin, G. T. (2006). Measuring emergence in the dynamics of new venture creation. Journal of Business Venturing, 21(2), 153–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2005.04.002
39. Lokhande, M. A. (2017). Analysis of entrepreneurial skill development of disadvantaged group entrepreneurs. Prabandhan : Indian Journal of Management, 10(3), 7–18. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2017/v10i3/111423
40. Malmberg, A., & Maskell, P. (2006). Localized learning revisited. Growth and Change, 37(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2257.2006.00302.x
41. Malmberg, A., Solvell, O., & Zander, I. (1996). Spatial clustering, local accumulation of knowledge and firm competitiveness. Geografiska Annaler : Series B, Human Geography, 78(2), 85–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/04353684.1996.11879699
42. Mathias, B. D., McCann, B. T., & Whitman, D. S. (2020). A meta-analysis of agglomeration and venture performance: Firm-level evidence. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 15(3), 430–453. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1390
43. McCann, B. T., & Folta, T. B. (2009). Demand- and supply-side agglomerations: Distinguishing between fundamentally different manifestations of geographic concentration. Journal of Management Studies, 46(3), 362–392. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00815.x
44. Moriset, B. (2017). Inventing new places in the creative city: coworking spaces, Territory in movement. Revue de géographie et aménagement [Online], 34. https://doi.org/10.4000/tem.3868
45. Muegge, S. (2013). Platforms, communities, and business ecosystems: Lessons learned about technology entrepreneurship in an interconnected world. Technology Innovation Management Review, 3(2), 5–15. https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview655
46. Nambisan, S., & Baron, R. A. (2013). Entrepreneurship in innovation ecosystems: Entrepreneurs’ self-regulatory processes and their implications for new venture success. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37(5), 1071–1097. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2012.00519.x
47. O’Mahony, S., & Bechky, B. A. (2008). Boundary organizations: Enabling collaboration among unexpected allies. Administrative Science Quarterly, 53(3), 422–459. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.53.3.422
48. Patton, M. Q. (1999). Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analysis. Health Services Research, 34(5 Pt 2),1189–1208. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10591279%0Ahttp://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=PMC1089059
49. Pe’er, A., Vertinsky, I., & King, A. (2008). Who enters, where and why? The influence of capabilities and initial resource endowments on the location choices of de novo enterprises. Strategic Organization, 6(2), 119–149. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127008090007
50. Pfeffermann, N., Minshall, T., & Mortara, L. (2013). Strategy and communication for innovation. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41479-4
51. Pollard, J. (2003). Book Review: Knowledge economies: Clusters, learning and cooperative advantage. Progress in Human Geography, 27(1), 125–127. https://doi.org/10.1177/030913250302700111
52. Porter, M. E. (2000). Location, competition, and economic development: Local clusters in a global economy. Economic Development Quarterly, 14(1), 15–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124240001400105
53. Posen, H. E., & Chen, J. S. (2013). An advantage of newness : Vicarious learning despite limited absorptive capacity. Organization Science, 24(6). https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1120.0815
54. Rawley, E., & Seamans, R. (2020). Internal agglomeration and productivity: Evidence from microdata. Strategic Management Journal, 41(10), 1770–1798. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3200
55. Scott, M., & Bruce, R. (1987). Five stages of growth in small business. Long Range Planning, 20(3), 45–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-6301(87)90071-9
56. Shane, S. (2000). Prior knowledge and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities. Organization Science, 11(4), 448–469. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.11.4.448.14602
57. Sperindé, S., & Nguyen-Duc, A. (2020). Fostering open innovation in coworking spaces: A study of Norwegian start-ups. In, A. Nguyen-Duc, J. Münch, R. Prikladnicki, X. Wang, & P. Abrahamsson (eds.), Fundamentals of software startups. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35983-6_10
58. Spinuzzi, C. (2012). Working alone together : Coworking as emergent collaborative activity. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 26(4), 399–441. https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651912444070
59. Steiber, A. (2020). Technology management: Corporate-startup co-location and how to measure the effects. Journal of Technology Management and Innovation, 15(2), 11–22. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-27242020000200011
60. Tajpour, M., Salamzadeh, A., Salamzadeh, Y., & Braga, V. (2021). Investigating social capital, trust and commitment in family business: Case of media firms. Journal of Family Business Management, Ahead of Print. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFBM-02-2021-0013
61. Tomar, J. S. (2017). State of IT adoption in SMEs in India. Prabandhan : Indian Journal of Management, 10(1), 40–53. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2017/v10i1/109102
62. Van Der Panne, G. (2004). Agglomeration externalities: Marshall versus Jacobs. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 14, 593–604. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-004-0232-x
63. Venkat, R., Gupta, A., Banerjee, J., & Chellappan, R. B. (2021). Physical co-location: An intersection of problem-solving and vicarious learning. Action Learning: Research and Practice. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767333.2021.1954879
64. Wang, L., Madhok, A., & Li, S. X. (2014). Agglomeration and clustering over the industry life cycle: Toward a dynamic model of geographic concentration. Strategic Management Journal, 35(7), 995–1012. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2141
65. Wright, M., & Drori, I. (2018). Accelerators: Successful venture creation and growth. Accelerators: Successful Venture Creation and Growth, 1–212. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781786434098
66. Zhang, Y., & Li, H. (2010). Innovation search of new ventures in a technology cluster : The role of ties with service intermediaries. Strategic Management Journal, 31(1), 88–109. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.806