Sustainable Research Culture for Enhancing the Quality of Deliverables in Classroom Teaching-Learning Environment : An In-Depth Analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2016/v9i9/101505Keywords:
Research Culture
, Institution, Education, Deliverables, Class-Room Environment, Class-Room TeachingI21
, I23, I28Paper Submission Date
, January 28, 2016, Paper sent back for Revision, May 23, Paper Acceptance Date, August 10, 2016.Abstract
In higher and technical education institutions across the globe, teaching and research complement and supplement each other, which leads to enhanced quality of deliverables in classrooms and constitutes a chain on the pattern of the supply chain in industry. Each and every component of the chain is linked and integrated with each other in such a fashion that it becomes unreasonable to think about any of the components without considering the importance of others. Naturally, the faculty inherits an institutional culture, whatsoever it may be, and often contributes to enrich and strengthen the existing culture or else create a new culture, which is more coherent with the short and long-term objectives of an institution. However, in the absence of an institution's culture, the faculty try to develop a particular culture required for fulfilling the set objectives and ultimate goals of the institution. In the backdrop of the prevailing teaching and learning scenario in the country, what sort of research culture is expected to prevail in an institution has been studied in detail in different interfacing contexts. The present study is, therefore, a modest attempt to analyze how the research culture can be created in an academic institution not only for enhancing, but also for sustaining the quality of deliverables through effective classroom teaching-learning environment supported by proactive involvement and participation of students in such endeavours.Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
References
All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE) (2016). AQIS guidelines and process handbook 2015 - 16 : Research Promotion Scheme. Retrieved from www.aicte-india.org/downloads/handbook.pdf
All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE). (2012). Annual report (2011-2012). Retrieved from http://www.aicte-india.org/downloads/Annual_report_11_12.pdf#toolbar=0
Benek-Rivera, J., & Mathews, V. E. (2004). Active learning with jeopardy: Students ask the questions. Journal of Management Education, 28, 104 - 118.
Cook, E. D., & Hazelwood, A. C. (2002). An active learning strategy for the classroom. Journal of Accounting Education, 20, 297 - 306.
Guthrie, J. T., & Cox, K. (2001). Classroom conditions for motivation and engagement in reading. Educational Psychology Review, 13 (3), 283-302.
Hackathorn, J., Solomon, E. D., Blankmeyer, K. L., Tennial, R. E., & Garczynskib, A. M. (2011). Learning by doing : An empirical study of active teaching techniques. The Journal of Effective Teaching, 11 (2), 40-54.
Hackathorn, J., Solomon, E. D., Tennial, R. E., Garczynski, A. M., Blankmeyer, K., Gebhardt, K., & Anthony, J. N. (2010). You get out what you put in : Student engagement affects assessment. Poster presentation : Best Practices in Assessment Conference, Atlanta, GA.
Hill, R. (1999). Revisiting the term “Research Culture.â€.Paper presented in the Proceedings of the HERDSA Annual International Conference, Melbourne, 12-15 July, 1999.
Kaur, I., Shri, C., & Mital, K. M. (2015). A flexible approach towards effective teaching : Use of social media by teachers. Global Journal of Flexible System Management, 16 (4), 391-403.
Michel, N., Cater III, J. J., & Varela, O. (2009). Active versus passive teaching styles: An empirical study of student outcomes. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 20 (4), 397-418.
Ministry of Human Resource Development, Government of India (2015). Annual report (2014-15) : Research Park. Retrieved from htpp://mhrd.gov.in/sites/upload_files/mhrd/filesdocument-reports/part1.pdf
Munmun, S. B. (2013). Methods of delivery of lectures in classroom. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education, 1 (2), 52-58.
National University of Educational Planning and Administration. (2015). Annual Report (2014-15) : Research. Retrieved from http://www.nuepa.org/new/download/Publications/Annual%20report%202014-15(ENGLISH)-web.pdf.
NCERT. (n.d.). Division of educational research. Retrieved from htpp://www.ncert.nic.in/departments/nie/der
Peck, A. C., Ali, R. S., Matchock, R. L., & Levine, M. E. (2006). Introductory psychology topics and student performance: Where's the challenge? Teaching of Psychology, 33 (3), 167-170.
Planning Commission, Government of India. (2014). Annual Report 2013-2014 : Research Division. Retrieved from http://www.planningcommission.gov.in/reports/genrep/anu_e13_14.pdf
Reber, P. (2010). What is the memory capacity of the human brain? Scientific American. Retrieved from http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm
Sarason, Y., & Banbury, C. (2004). Active learning facilitated by using a game-show format or who doesn't want to be a millionaire? Journal of Management Education, 28, 509 - 519.
Stewart-Wingfield, S., & Black, G. S. (2005). Active versus passive course designs: The impact on student outcomes. Journal of Education for Business, 81, 119 - 125.
Talib, F., Rahman, Z., & Qureshi, M. N. (2010). Pareto analysis of total quality management factors critical to success for service industries. International Journal of Quality Research, 4 (2), 155-168.
Tata. (n.d.). Sir Dorabji Tata Trust : Institutional grants. Retrieved from htpp://www.tata.com/aboutus/articlesinside/Sir-Dorabji-Tata-Trust-and-the-Allied-Trust
University Grant Commission (UGC). (2015). Annual Report (2014-2015) : Promotion of research. Retrieved from http://www.ugc.ac.in/pdfnews/2465555_Annual-Report-2014-15.pdf
Whetten, D. A., & Clark, S. C. (1996). An integrated model for teaching management skills. Journal of Management Education, 20, 152 - 181.
Xinying, S., Xue, Z., & Zhang, H. (2015). A study on the research oriented teaching courses : Reform in Chinese colleges and universities. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 5 (4), 260-264.