Women Riding a Two - Wheeler in Chennai : Has the Perception Changed ? A Perspective

Authors

  •   Ramnath Srinath Lecturer, Assumption University, Ramkhamhaeng Soi 24, Huamark, Bangkok, 10240

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2018/v11i2/121394

Keywords:

Two Wheelers

, Social, Functional, and Epistemic Values, Accessibility, Homemakers, Students, Working Women

J11

, L62, M10, O11

Paper Submission Date

, August 24, 2017, Paper sent back for Revision, November 8, Paper Acceptance Date, December 27, 2017.

Abstract

Riding two wheelers by Indian women is still not common - it is more a compulsion than choice. Physical inability to move around more easily, a traditional outlook in society- joint families are the conventional impediments that affect the purchase decision of two wheelers among Indian women. Initiatives have been taken by a few two-wheeler marketing companies to break the myth of an almost impossible task through innovative designs, targeting women riders too. A large market is untapped as indicated by their survey; while little is happening. Under this backdrop, this study is an initiative to convert the compulsion into choice after studying the mass opinions based on a primary field survey. Three groups of women participated in the study as samples and the purposive sampling method was used; the women respondents were categorized into three categories: namely working women, students, and homemakers. The study indicated interesting results, signaling choice disparity. The impact is yet to set in, in a big way, and it is rather a challenge for marketing companies to convert the chance into choice in future by preparing appropriate plans to target more women users and persuade them to use two wheelers as a convenient mode of transport.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2018-02-01

How to Cite

Srinath, R. (2018). Women Riding a Two - Wheeler in Chennai : Has the Perception Changed ? A Perspective. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 11(2), 30–39. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2018/v11i2/121394

Issue

Section

General Management

References

Aaker, A. D. (1996). Measuring brand equity across products and markets. California Management Review, 38 (3), 101-120.

Anderson, E.W., Fornell, C., & Lehmann, D. R. (1994). Customer satisfaction, market share, and profitability: Findings from Sweden. Journal of Marketing, 58 (3), 53 - 66.

Banu, H., Chakrabarty, N., Michael, R. J., Kumar, R., Sudhir, P.M., Sharma, M. K., & Mehrotra, S. (2013). Two-wheeler riding patterns, perceptions and aggressive riding behavior among college youth. International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering & Technology, 2 (9), 4250 - 4256.

Butters, J., Mann, R. E., Wickens, C. M., & Boase, P. (2012). Gender differences and demographic influences in perceived concern for driver safety and support for impaired driving counter measures. Journal of Safety Research, 43 (5 - 6), 405 - 411.

East, R., Hammond, K. A., & Wright, M. (2007). The relative incidence of positive and negative word of mouth: A multi- category study. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 24 (2), 175 -184.

James, F. A., & Sudha, S. (2017). Moderating effect of work place support on the social life of night shift employees. Prabandhan : Indian Journal of Management, 10 (6), 49 - 56. doi:10.17010/pijom/2017/v10i6/115375

Nesbit, S.M., & Conger, J.C. (2012). Predicting aggressive driving behavior from anger and negative cognitions. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 15 (6), 710 - 718. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2012.07.003

Oliver, R. L. (1997). Satisfaction: A behavioral perspective of the consumer. New York, NY : McGraw-Hill.

Subramaniam, D. (2016). Evolving global business trends and India's challenges. Prabandhan : Indian Journal of Management, 9 (3), 43 - 53. doi:10.17010/pijom/2016/v9i3/89185

Sweeney, J., Soutar, G., & Mazzarol, T. (2014). Factors enhancing word-of-mouth influence: Positive and negative service related messages. European Journal of Marketing, 48 (1/2), 336 - 359. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-06-2012-0336