A Study of Awareness and Perception Regarding MOOC Courses with Special Reference to NPTEL

Authors

  •   Amit Kumar Arora Associate Professor, KIET School of Management, KIET Group of Institutions, Delhi-NCR, Ghaziabad - 201 206
  •   Santosh Kumar Associate Professor, Sharda School of Business Studies, Sharda University, Delhi-NCR, Greater Noida - 201 310
  •   Deepak Bansal Associate Professor (Corresponding Author), Sharda School of Business Studies, Sharda University, Delhi-NCR, Greater Noida - 201 310
  •   Swati Bansal Assistant Professor, Sharda School of Business Studies, Sharda University, Delhi-NCR, Greater Noida - 201 310

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2024/v17i4/173427

Keywords:

MOOC

, Online Learning, Distance Education, Distance Learning, NPTEL.

JEL Classification Codes

, I20, I21, I23

Paper Submission Date

, August 10, 2023, Paper sent back for Revision, March 10, 2024, Paper Acceptance Date, March 25, Paper Published Online, April 15, 2024

Abstract

Purpose : The study aimed to determine the level of awareness among students regarding NPTEL MOOCs and the reasons for registering or not registering for the courses. Further, this study explored the impact of gender and qualification on the category of aware respondents.

Methodology : The study was a cross-sectional study for which data were collected from the Delhi-NCR region from January to March 2023. The study was based on primary data, considering 379 responses that were collected with the help of a structured questionnaire. The chi-square test and descriptive statistics were used to analyze the data.

Findings : The study found that receiving the certificate, being more convenient regarding timing and location, and having command over the subject were the perceived benefits of doing NPTEL courses. The main reasons for not finishing the course were time constraints, students’ poor course selection, and loss of momentum as the course progressed. Gender was found to be independent of the category of aware respondents, while qualification was not found to be independent.

Practical Implications : It was recommended that universities, colleges, and teachers adopt blended learning, which included e-learning as well as face-to-face learning, to help students score more. The NPTEL course providers and teachers should spread awareness regarding the courses, as 31% of the respondents were not aware of NPTEL. The study recommended that students be more careful while choosing the course and complete the course to earn the certificate, which can enhance their curriculum and, in turn, help them get a good job.

Originality : Unlike prior research on the utility of MOOCs, the current work examined the learner’s perception toward the NPTEL courses conducted by the premium institutions in India.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2024-04-01

How to Cite

Arora, A. K., Kumar, S., Bansal, D., & Bansal, S. (2024). A Study of Awareness and Perception Regarding MOOC Courses with Special Reference to NPTEL. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 17(4), 43–57. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2024/v17i4/173427

Issue

Volume 17, Issue 4, April 2024

Section

Articles
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

Allen, I. E., Seaman J., Poulin R., & Straut T. T. (2016). Online report card: Tracking online education in the United States. Thirteenth Annual Report by Babson Survey Research Group and Quahog Research Group. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED572777.pdf

Alqurashi, E. (2018). Predicting student satisfaction and perceived learning in online learning environments. Distance Education, 40(1), 133–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2018.1553562

Arora, A. K., & Srinivasan, R. (2020). Impact of pandemic COVID-19 on the teaching-learning process: A study of higher education teachers. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 13(4), 43–56. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2020/v13i4/151825

Bruff, D. O., Fisher, D. H., McEwen, K. E., & Smith, B. E. (2013). Wrapping a MOOC: Student perception of an experiment in blended learning. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 9(2), 187–199. https://jolt.merlot.org/vol9no2/bruff_0613.pdf

Chopra, G., Madan, P., Jaisingh, P., & Bhaskar, P. (2019). Effectiveness of e-learning portal from students' perspectives: A structural equation model (SEM) approach. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 16(2), 94–116. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-05-2018-0027

Chung, L. Y. (2015). Exploring the effectiveness of self-regulated learning in massive open online courses for non-native english speakers. International Journal of Distance Education Technologies (IJDET), 13(3), 61–73. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJDET.2015070105

Gamage, D., Perera, I., & Fernando, S. (2016). Evaluating the effectiveness of MOOCs using empirical tools: Learners perspective. 10th International Technology, Education and Development Conference, Valencia, Spain, 8276–8284. https://doi.org/10.21125/inted.2016.0937

Gasevic, D., Kovanovic, V., Joksimovic, S., & Siemens, G. (2014). Where is research on massive open online courses headed? A data analysis of the MOOC Research Initiative. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(5). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v15i5.1954

Gill, S., Sharma, A., & Jain, D. M. (2023). Digital disruptions in education: Students' perspective. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 16(9), 61–77. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2023/v16i9/173167

Goh, L. H. (2016). The effectiveness and challenges of MOOC for learning. In, Third Asia-Pacific Conference on Advanced Research (APCAR, Melbourne, July 2016), 275–287. https://apiar.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/16_APCAR_July_BRR771_EDU-275-287.pdf

Kumar, S., Janardhanan, A. K., Khanna, S., William, R. M., & Saha, S. (2023). Students' satisfaction with remote learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: Insights for policymakers. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 16(9), 43–60. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2023/v16i9/173166

Kumar Basak, S., Wotto, M., & Bélanger, P. (2018). E-learning, M-learning, and D-learning: Conceptual definition and comparative analysis. E-Learning and Digital Media, 15(4), 191–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/2042753018785180

Kuo, Y.-C., Walker, A. E., Belland, B. R., & Schroder, K. E. (2013). A predictive study of student satisfaction in online education programmes. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 14(1), 16–39. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v14i1.1338

Lone, A. Z. (2017). Impact of online education in India. International Journal of Engineering Science and Computing, 7(7), 13050–13952.

Othman, M. S., Tashimaimaiti, G., Yusuf, L. M., & Al-Rahmi, W. M. (2018). End-user perspectives on the effectiveness of learning performance through massive open online courses (MOOCs). In, F. Saeed, N. Gazem, S. Patnaik, A. Saed Balaid, & F. Mohammed (eds), Recent trends in information and communication technology. IRICT 2017. Lecture notes on data engineering and communication technologies (Vol 5). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59427-9_72

Patidar, N., & Singh, A. K. (2018). Perception of male and female students towards need of open courseware in institutions of higher learning and its associated factors: A comparative study. International Journal of Research and Analytical Reviews, 5(4), 102–106. http://ijrar.com/upload_issue/ijrar_issue_20542146.pdf

Pham, L., Limbu, Y. B., Bui, T. K., Nguyen, H. T., & Pham, H. T. (2019). Does e-learning service quality influence e-learning student satisfaction and loyalty? Evidence from Vietnam. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(7). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0136-3

Prasad, P. D., Sunitha, K. V., & Rani, B. P. (2019). Factors affecting students continued intention to use MOOCs, benefits and drawbacks: A research paper from the UAE context. International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering (IJITEE), 8(6S4), 763–779. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijitee.F1154.0486S419

Rajabalee, B. Y., Santally, M. I., & Rennie, F. (2020). A study of the relationship between students' engagement and their academic performances in an e-Learning environment. E-Learning and Digital Media, 17(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/2042753019882567

Saadatdoost, R., Jafarkarimi, H., Hiang Sim, A. T., & Hee, J. M. (2019). Understanding MOOC learners: Insights from participation in Coursera MOOC. International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies, 14(1), 93–112. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJWLTT.2019010107

Shokeen, A., Kumar, A., & Khanna, S. (2023). Understanding students' behavioral intention to adopt blended learning: Modified UTAUT model. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 16(11), 43–64. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2023/v16i11/170915

Toven-Lindsey, B., Rhoads, R. A., & Lozano, J. B. (2015). Virtually unlimited classrooms: Pedagogical practises in massive open online courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 24, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.07.001

Ventista, O. M. (2018). Self-assessment in massive open online courses. E-Learning and Digital Media, 15(4), 165–175. https://doi.org/10.1177/2042753018784950

Weiand, A., Manssour, I. H., & Silveira, M. S. (2019). Visual analysis for monitoring students in distance courses. International Journal of Distance Education Technologies (IJDET), 17(2), 18–44. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJDET.2019040102

Wong, B. (2016). Factors leading to effective teaching of MOOCs. Asian Association of Open Universities Journal, 11(1), 105–118. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAOUJ-07-2016-0023

Zaneldin, E., Ahmed, W., & El-Ariss, B. (2019). Video-based e-learning for an undergraduate engineering course. E-Learning and Digital Media, 16(6), 475–496. https://doi.org/10.1177/2042753019870938

Zawacki-Richter, O., Bozkurt, A., Alturki, U., & Aldraweesh, A. (2018). What research says about MOOCs – An explorative content analysis. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(1), 242–259. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v19i1.3356