Building Pillars of Sustainability: An Empirical Investigation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2013/v6i8/60021Keywords:
Sustainable Development
, Corporate Social Responsibility, Economic Performance, Expenditure on CSRC33
, C87, M14, Q56Paper Submission Date
, April 16, 2013, Paper Acceptance Date, June 30, 2013.Abstract
In the present parlance, sustainability is the requirement. Humankind is using natural resources at a faster rate than they are being replaced. If this continues, future generations will not have the resources they need for their development. Sustainable development is about meeting the needs of the society while living within the planet's ecological limits and without jeopardizing the ability of future generations to meet their needs. Social responsibility is closely linked to sustainable development. Corporate Social Responsibility is an entry point for understanding sustainable development issues and responding to them in a firm's business strategy. Keeping in mind the objectivity of the article, the paper describes the conceptual framework of sustainable development and its three pillars. The next section discusses the relationship between sustainable development and corporate social responsibility in the context of developing economies. For the empirical analysis, the hypotheses were formulated to study the relationship between the average market price of the companies and the environmental performance and expenditure on CSR.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
References
Barlund, K. (n.d.). Sustainable development concept and action. United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE). Retrieved from http://www.unece.org/oes/nutshell/2004-2005/focus_sustainable_development.html
Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 4 (4), 497-505.
Ebner, D., & Baumgartner, R. J. (2006). The relationship between sustainable development and corporate social responsibility. Corporate Responsibility Research Conference (CRRC), September 4-5, 2006, Dublin, 1-17.
Elkington, J. (1998). Cannibals with Forks: Triple bottom line of the 21st century. Oxford: Capstone Publishing.
ITC (2011). Annual Reports and Sustainability Reports (2010-11). Retrieved from www.itcportal.com.
Karmayog (2010). Karmayog CSR rating 2010 of the 500 largest Indian companies. Retrieved from http://www.karmayog.org/redirect/strred.asp?docId=32905
Ministry of Heavy Industries & Public Enterprises, Government of India (2012, May 23). CSR fund allocation of Maharatnas and Navratnas [Press release] Retrieved from http://pib.nic.in/newsite/erelease.aspx?relid=84412
Pratap,S., Pandita, S., & Panimbang, F. (2012). Liberalization of the Economy and the politics of corporate social responsibility in India. In Asia Monitor Resource Centre (Ed.), The reality of corporate social responsibility-case studies on the impact of CSR on workers in China, South Korea, India and Indonesia, Hong Kong.
Unilever (2009). Sustainable living plan in India: Report and Progress. Retrieved from www.hul.co.in
Unilever (2010). Sustainable living plan in India: Report and Progress. Retrieved from www.hul.co.in
WBCSD (2006). Corporate Social Responsibility. Retrieved from http://www.wbcsd.org/templates/TemplateWBCSD1/layout.asp?type=p&MenuId= MzI3&doOpen=1&ClickMenu=LeftMenuAlessia D'Amato, Sybil Henderson, Sue Florence: Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainable Business-A Guide to Leadership Tasks and Functions
Wikipedia (2013). Brundtland Commission. Retrieved from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brundtland_Commission
Wikipedia (2013). United States Education Program/Courses/Global Enterprise and Sustainable Development (Ming Xu)/Sandbox Brundtland Commission. Retrieved from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:United_States_Education_Program/Courses/Global_Enterprise_and_Sustainable_Development_(Ming_Xu)/Sandbox_Brundtland _Commission